Know which programs are slipping — before the steering committee does.
Ontologic puts every program, risk, resource, and dependency on one live model. Your portfolio view reflects what’s actually happening, your status reports write themselves, and you stop finding out about red programs a week too late.
You’re running a portfolio on a RAID log nobody trusts.
Every program lives in its own plan. Risks, issues, and dependencies sit in a spreadsheet that’s only as current as the last person who remembered to update it. Each reporting cycle you chase PMs for status, reconcile numbers that don’t agree, and rebuild the steering deck by hand — and the moment it’s done, it’s already stale.
So the questions that actually decide outcomes — which programs are at risk, where resources are double-booked, which dependency is about to blow a date — get answered late, if at all.

Every program, one model.
Dozens of programs, risks, and dependencies — but not dozens of disconnected plans. Every program writes to the same model, so Ontologic answers questions that span the whole portfolio, and acts on the answer.
Each question spans programs a single plan keeps apart. One model is what makes the answer — and the action — possible.
One connection. Your whole portfolio — in action.
Connect Ontologic to Claude once. From then on, plain-language questions run against your live portfolio model — Claude calls the right module and acts on the answer.
Flag a risk. It routes itself.
A risk surfaced on the model becomes an action with an owner; the owner works it; it’s marked resolved and the portfolio view updates — a closed loop through your governance, with no status-chasing.
To do
In progress
Done
No one chases status, copies context, or reconciles the RAID by hand. The work moves itself, because every program shares one model.

Ask the portfolio anything. Act on the answer.
Because every program, plan, risk, and resource shares one model, you can ask “which programs are at risk, and why?” and get an answer grounded in real data — then have Ontologic draft the escalation, surface the resource you can reallocate, or write the update. Set it to flag a program the moment it trends red, before it’s a surprise.
And it works with Claude over MCP, so the AI you already use runs your portfolio instead of just talking about it.

The whole portfolio, on one live model.
A portfolio view that’s actually current
Every program’s real status and RAG, reflecting what’s happening in the work — not last week’s deck.
Risk and RAID, maintained for you
Risks, issues, and dependencies surfaced from across programs and flagged before they cost you a date.
Resourcing across programs
See contention and conflicts the moment they form, not at the next portfolio review.
Cross-program dependencies
Know when a slip in one program threatens a date in another.
Status that writes itself
Steering-committee and stakeholder updates drafted from real data, not assembled by hand.
Governance built in
Stage gates, escalations, and the audit trail — on the same graph as the work.
It all lives on one model, so when a milestone moves, the dependent programs, the resource plan, and the at-risk flags all know.
Not a heavier PPM tool. A model that keeps itself current.
Spreadsheets & status decks
Always a week behind and maintained by hand. Ontologic is current because the work flows into it.
Legacy PPM
Rigid, expensive, and built before AI. Ontologic is the live operating layer underneath your programs.
Generic AI
Doesn’t know your portfolio. Ontologic hands it the live model — and the power to act on it.
See your portfolio the way it actually is.
We’re working with a small group of firms to put their programs on one model. If you’re running a portfolio on spreadsheets and steering decks, let’s talk.
